The Daily Mail Reveals: The Truths and Lies in the Royal Interview

But between all the Pandora’s boxes the two have opened, the British Daily Mail has decided to conduct its own investigation, and has now revealed that quite a few of the two’s claims are half-truths or claims that do not stand the test of reality at all, according to the magazine.

Megan claims: “I never did any research on the royal family before I joined. I did not gobble up my husband.”

The Daily Mail: Unlikely.

This testimony of Merkel, they claim, contradicts the information revealed in a biography written about the couple. Although the two insist that they did not contribute information to the biography Finding Freedom written by two journalists, they say that the information in it came from sources very close to the couple. Prior to their first meeting in 2016, it was written, it was only natural that both parties would come prepared for this “blind meeting” with information that came from in-depth research on Google. Harry deafened Megan’s profile on social media and expressed interest.

Megan claims she did not investigate the royal family and did not understand why she was entering or knew too much about the royal palace.

The Daily Mail: Its members claim the opposite is true.

Merkel, they were told, was mesmerized by the royal family as a girl. Her bridesmaid at her first wedding even revealed that Merkel has always aspired to be “Princess Diana 2.” “She loved the movies about Diana and even had her own book in the room,” she revealed.

Aspired to be

Megan claims: We were married by the Archbishop of Canterbury in a private ceremony, three days before the wedding was broadcast to the whole world.

The Daily Mail: Unlikely.

Marriage by the Anglican Church requires at least 2 witnesses, and the public should have unlimited access to the place where the ceremony takes place, to allow anyone who opposes marriage to have their voice heard. At the time Merkel claims the wedding took place, the two lived in Kensington Palace which is outside the realm of the general public. A couple who has already entered into the marriage contract legally, can not choose to remarry unless there is doubt about the legal validity of their marriage. Apparently, one of the ceremonies was a status of exchange of vows only.

Megan claims, “I was silenced.”

The Daily Mail: Controversial.

While Merkel claims that from the moment the world learned that she and Harry were in a relationship, everyone who was related to her was explicitly instructed not to talk about them, the evidence on the ground paints a slightly different picture. On the day their engagement was announced, the two gave a lengthy interview to the BBC. On their trip to South Africa the two were interviewed by ITN in an interview in which Merkel provided the famous quote: “Not many people asked me if I was okay.” Internal sources at the palace claim that in contrast to the picture the two are trying to paint, they were actually the ones who set the tone in terms of public relations and their exposure, justifications to which the events they will take part, the interviews they will give and so on.

Archie's nobility title depends on many other titles // Photo: AFP

Megan argues: Archie has an innate right to a degree.

The Daily Mail: A lie.

Archie has no innate right, as of today, to the title of nobility, but that could change if and when his grandfather, Prince Charles, inherits the crown and becomes king. The law that automatically gave the children of William and Kate the title of nobility upon their birth more than 100 years old, from the days of King George.

Merkel claims: Archie will not receive guard and security services 24/7 because he is not a prince.

The Daily Mail: A lie.

The title prince or princess does not qualify for security and guarding services, those who carry it automatically. Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie for example (the cousins ​​of William and Harry), are not entitled despite their title of nobility to guarding and protection services funded by the tax money of the subjects of the kingdom. Harry and Megan, too, in the days after their official retirement from the royal palace are no longer entitled to it and pay for private security services.

Merkel claims: They did not agree to give me mental health care.

The Daily Mail: Hard to determine.

Merkel claimed that her mental distress was so severe that she felt she could no longer cope with it alone and in her head even suicidal thoughts began to pass. She claims that she asked human resources officials in the kingdom for help in obtaining mental health care, but was denied because she was not an official member of the aristocratic family. Winfrey did not want to know why Merkel turned to the human resources at the palace to deal with issues concerning the palace staff and not to the family doctor, the private one who is supposed to deal with family-related issues. Harry admitted that he felt ashamed of Megan’s condition, so he did not ask his family for help.

Merkel claims: Kate made me cry.

The Daily Mail: Controversial.

While the gossip columns reported that Merkel was the one who made Kate cry in the days leading up to her wedding to Harry due to a dispute while measuring flower girl dresses, Megan insisted the opposite was true and Kate was the one who made her cry. Merkel insisted the two straighten things out and Kate apologized and even brought her flowers, but internal sources tell a different version of the chain of events. According to sources, the debate revolved around one of two issues: whether the flower girls should wear tights (Merkel was against) or the dress of Princess Charlotte (daughter of Kate William) which was reportedly not in the right size and needed repairs, which annoyed Megan and allegedly led to a quarrel between sisters-in-law For the future.

Why did Merkel turn to human resources and not to a family doctor?  // Photo: AP

Merkel claims: We were exposed to racism mainly on the issue of Artzi’s skin color.

The Daily Mail: Almost impossible to refute or confirm.

Megan refused to reveal the same person at the palace who expressed concern about Archie’s skin color (Megan is known to be of mixed descent and the daughter of a black mother) but Harry insisted on making it clear that this was not his grandmother Queen Elizabeth or his grandfather Prince Philip.

Megan Merkel: I grew up as an only child. I have not had any contact with my half-sister for two decades.

The Daily Mail: A lie.

Megan insisted in an interview that the relationship with her half-sister Samantha has not existed for nearly two decades, but Samantha insists that this is a lie. A 2008 photo, from Samantha’s college graduation ceremony, shows the two being photographed together hugging and smiling, and she insists that over the years the two have been in a relationship, one that she can back up with photos and other evidence.

Harry claims: Cut off all financial support for me.

The Daily Mail: A lie.

While Megan and Harry try to present themselves as the one the royal family has chosen to disconnect from any past financial aid channel, in reality, it has been argued, they were the ones who sought, let alone insisted, to pursue economic independence, one that would allow them to choose their own projects and generate capital Their self without having to report or depend on the palace.

They were the ones who insisted on becoming financially independent // Photo: REUTERS

Megan claims: The media invented stories about my dad to produce drama.

The Daily Mail: A lie.

The relationship between Merkel and her father Thomas is strained and almost non-existent for years, when the climax was in the period leading up to her wedding, so the father sold pictures of her to the paparazzi. After the interview, Thomas also referred to the allegations of racism in the palace as bullshit and claimed that contrary to Merkel’s claims, she did not lose him as a father and he would like to renew the relationship.

Megan claims: We have not been protected from false rumors and reports. They chose to sacrifice us to protect other family members in the palace.

The Daily Mail: Controversial and probably mostly false.

Contrary to Merkel’s insistence, people close to the palace say that quite a few times attempts have been made to prevent false publications about the couple that also succeeded and led to censorship of offensive and false news. Moreover, sources insisted, it was Merkel’s own staff that needed protection from her abusive behavior, as was recently revealed when it became known that an investigation would be conducted into the matter after former employees complained about Merkel.

Leave the truth behind?  // Photo: EPA

.Source