
Company
a building
-2.39%
Base:823.7
opening:817.6
Tall:823
low:800.3
change:3,053,107
Page Quote News Graphs Company Profile Recommendations
More articles on the subject:
You respond to the district court’s request and amend the share offer
Real Estate Rock
+ 0.61%
Base:723.6
opening:723
Tall:743
low:705.2
change:16,740,097
Page Quote News Graphs Company Profile Recommendations
More articles on the subject:
. Under the new offer, the cash alternative from the original offer will be returned to the table without placing a ceiling on the amount to be given, and the conversion ratio will be improved so that 1.05 shares of structure will be received for each share of Sela.
The new proposal follows the condition set by District Judge Magen Altuvia in a hearing held last weekend to approve a move to take over a building on Sela Real Estate. Following a building’s response, a discussion on the new proposal is expected at the Sela shareholders’ meeting on Wednesday.
The offer gives Sela a value of NIS 1.73 million, and a premium of about 20% on the market price. Prior to the change, it set a ceiling structure of NIS 250 million on the cash alternative, so that beyond this amount it can only offer shares of a structure to Sela’s shareholders – even if they prefer the second option. Now if so, shareholders will be able to choose one of the two alternatives. In the previous offer, the exchange ratio between the shares was such that for each share of Sela Real Estate, 0.92 shares of a structure will be received.
Mivna’s CEO Dudu Zabida claims that Sela Real Estate’s performance, led by chairman Shmuel Selvin, falls short of those of Mivna, and that Sela’s shareholders are losing out – including Mivna itself. It is said that the occupancy rates in the assets of a structure are inferior to their own, and that the debt structure of Sela is better and even that the management fees are the lowest in the market.
To complete the takeover, a structure must obtain a 75% majority of the shareholders who are not defined as stakeholders in the company, these will indicate the proposal to revoke its status as a REIT fund, for all the tax benefits derived therefrom. This is another obstacle that a structure will need to overcome, as Altuvia stated that the definition of personal interest will be based on a 70% difference between the value of the holdings in a structure share and that of rock shares – similar to the original structure proposal, which it later sought to change.
Did you find a mistake in the article?
Write to us and we will fix
Want to be updated?
Sign up for our mailing
Comments on the article(0):
Your response has been received and will be published subject to system policies.
Thanks.
For a new response
Your response was not sent due to a communication problem, please try again.
Return to comment