A week and a half ago, Roman Zadorov’s attorney, Adv. Yarom Halevi, filed a motion for a retrial. Omissions of the police and the prosecution), and an entire chapter in the application is devoted to evidence pointing to the real killer, he claims – AK.
The application is available for reading on all 373 pages, full of new and old evidence proving Zadorov’s innocence, miscarriages of justice (a variety of police and prosecutorial omissions), and an entire chapter is devoted to evidence pointing to the real killer, he claims – AK
Adv. Halevy called the request “a bomb that penetrates bunkers at a depth of kilometers.” At that moment release.
Otherwise, how can one explain the fact that yesterday two new discoveries were suddenly revealed to Adv. Halevi?
One: Shaq was questioned, without warning, about a month ago, about her alleged confessions to a girl.
The second: on another testimony given to the police by a friend of Anat, AK’s friend (it has long been known that Anat told various people that AK confessed to her that she murdered the late Tair Rada), who also said that Anat also told him that The killer.
I will try to put in order the many initials in this encrypted affair, buried under bizarre restraining orders, as well as in the complex course of events, where the truth lies in the small details and especially in understanding the true chronology of events
ATry to put in order the many acronyms in this encrypted affair, buried under bizarre restraining orders, as well as in the complex course of events, where the truth lies in the small details and especially in understanding the chronology of events.Real:
According to the testimonies, AK confessed to three different people, each of whom was a close soda man at different times:
1
brother – who was her partner for 9 years, from whom she separated shortly before reporting in 2012 (6 years after the murder) that she was the one who murdered Tair. A.H. made many allegations and provided even elaborate details, but in our case now it is especially important to note that according to him, AK confessed to him that night after the murder And even showed him a bag with things that were used by her for murder including his own blood-stained clothes.
2
Anat AK’s friend from a period of hospitalization in a mental hospital. AK was apparently hospitalized for the first time in her life, and was probably even diagnosed as mentally ill for the first time in her life. only after Arrest following the testimony of A.H.
Why was she hospitalized? Because after she was under house arrest, when she was suspected of the murder of the late Tair, a guy with whom she was in a passing relationship named Shimon attacked her and tried to murder him with a broken bottle. She was interrogated in which she first confessed to things she had previously denied (her love of blood and gut).
When she was suspected of the murder of the late Tair, she attacked a guy with whom she was in a passing relationship and tried to murder him with a broken bottle. She was taken over, she was arrested, and during her arrest she tried to bite a policeman to take a piece of meat
She was hospitalized for about two years. During the hospitalization she met Anat and she became a close friend of hers. Although Anat suffered from depression and committed suicide in 2015, before that she managed to tell about AK’s confession to her to a friend named Mai (who was recorded as part of the series “Shadow of Truth” and also committed suicide), to nurses at a mental hospital, and probably to another friend Her who came to the police and gave his testimony, Testimony that was suddenly found recently when they searched the prosecutor’s office and found it, according to them “due to a malfunction that occurred in good faith.”
3
father AB is a well-known activist in the struggle for the release of Zadorov. AB helped the creators of the series “Shadow of Truth” and joined AK apparently during the preparations for the series.
According to the testimonies, AK confessed to three different people, each of whom was a close soda man at different times
From the review of the schedules which, at the request of Adv. Halevi, and from various publications, it follows that:
6/15/17
As part of a civil proceeding of AK’s lawsuit against AB, an affidavit is filed in which AK admits that she told AB that she was involved in the murder of the deceased. AB submitted a questionnaire to AK in which she asked AK, among other things: “Did you say that you may have been involved in the murder of the late Tair Rada but do not remember it?” AK replied “I vaguely remember these things. I remember that following pressure she exerted on me, I said things about my alleged involvement in the Tair murder (Which of course is detached from reality) but I do not remember what the exact content of things was. “
From the affidavit of AK
10/18/17
AK is invited to an open testimony Following the testimonies of the late Anat’s caregivers, who apparently arrived at the police station after the series aired, and were surprised that their reports in real time about what Anat told them were not transmitted to the police. Despite AK’s bizarre and incriminating statements during her interrogation – the interrogation does not become an interrogation with a warning and she is released to her home.
10/14/18
Cash Precisely AB For questioning and is asked about AK’s remarks to her. AB claims that AK confessed to her that she was afraid to undergo a polygraph test for the “Shadow of Truth” program, regarding the question of whether she murdered the deceased, Because she’s afraid it’s going to turn out that she did murder her (“I’m afraid they’ll find out it’s really me”).
AB also submits that “in some parts of the relationship, AK told her in one way or another that she was involved in the murder. AB says she did not put any pressure on AK.” The only thing I told her was that[א”ח] A truth-teller came out with a polygraph [במסגרת תיחקורו בתוכנית “צל של אמת”]. It was something that the creators of the series shared with me, and only because I cared about[א”ק], So that you could tell her side correctly, only that could perhaps be construed as pressure from me…[א”ק] She could have chosen not to talk to me or call me at all if she felt I had pressured her. “
10/25/18
The Pathological Institute announces that one of the hypotheses from the body of the deceased Compatible with the mitochondrial DNA of AK, AK’s ex-partner, who as I recall said she murdered her while wearing his clothes.
The prosecution produces a statistical spin from an opinion attached to the institute’s opinion, as if the same DNA, which in the worst case deprived 99.55%, of the population, is not enough to link it to murder, and AK is not arrested or questioned under warning
The prosecution produces a statistical spin from an opinion attached to the institute’s opinion, as if the same DNA, which in the worst case deprived 99.55%, of the population, is not enough to link it to the murder, and AK is not arrested or questioned under warning, Already in his initial interrogation, more than six years before the discovery of the evidence, he gave the explanation for its presence.
And now we find that the State Attorney’s Office decided to collect testimony from AB, but did not collect MK testimony at the same time and did not investigate it. When were they remembered? Only a year later. And even then, as an interrogation without warning.
All this, just before it was known to all that attorney Halevi intends to file the application soon, and when the prosecution could have assumed that the issue would come up in the application (an article on the affidavit and witness AB called the “third witness” was published in Yedioth Ahronoth and elsewhere).
If so, it does not appear that the study of the truth is what drove the testimony collectors. It is more likely that the motive is to obtain a ready-made denial and explanations, which will be used to respond to a request for a retrial.
If so, it does not appear that the investigation of the truth is what motivated the testimony. It is more likely that the motive is to obtain a ready-made denial and explanations, which will be used to respond to a request for a retrial.
Hence, when the proponents of the State Attorney’s Office in this case criticize the “field trial” that is taking place on social networks and in the media – I can only remind them That the police and the State Attorney’s Office, in abandoning the investigation of the suspect and delaying Zadorov’s acquittal, are the ones who open the door to an investigation and sentencing arena, Which have long since expanded far beyond police stations and courtrooms.