Organic meat is no better for the planet – BGR

• The Earth is in the midst of a climate crisis, with rising temperatures, more intense storms, and the regular emergence of wildfires.
• The idea that organically raised stock may be better for the planet has been a thing of the past, but a new study shows it is no different than raised meat sources. routinely.
• Organic livestock practices may still be better for the animals themselves.

---

The Earth is warming. You may not notice it in your daily life, but the horrific storms, massive wildfires, and the catastrophic death of tropical ocean reefs are unbelievable. We know that greenhouse gases from fossil fuels are a major burden on the planet and the climate, but farming has also been cited as a contributor to such emissions.

Organic farming, both in plants and animals, has become very popular in recent years for a variety of reasons. Unfortunately, if you were to hope that organic livestock were something better for the planet than conventional practices, a new study is pushing into a dream.

Today’s main deal Best-selling retailers are selling for just $ 2.12 each thanks to this Amazon coupon List Price:$ 49.99 Price:$ 42.49 Save you:$ 7.50 (15%) Available from Amazon, BGR may receive a commission Buy now Available from Amazon BGR may receive a commission

The research, published in Nature Communication, focusing on greenhouse gas emissions from livestock farming. There are many sources of emissions from livestock farming, including the production of the food that the animals eat, methane gas from the animals themselves, and gas produced when their waste decomposes.

The study concludes that while emissions from organic stock are initially lower due to the fact that fertilizer is not used in the manufacture of the feed, the fact is that the animals are generally smaller (and less meat) means that farms will eventually have to build more of them to sustain the industry. This increase in animals detracts from the original benefits of organic stock, and the distribution rates are the same.

The researchers looked at different types of livestock for the study and found that organic meat breaks down even with normal meat, but in fact organic chicken farming produces more emissions than normal practices. Pork, on the other hand, leads to fewer emissions when raised organically, which is interesting.

Now, here are a few stars to deal with. Organic farming, whether animal or plant, has benefits for both animals and land. When organics are packaged with stock allowed to graze at the hobby (chicken tractors are awesome, you should Google it), the animals may not be as big and meaty, but they are at least allowed to live and behave like the animals they are, rather than being garbage bags for throwing in food and drugs until they are ready to be killed and eaten.

Unfortunately, the data shows that this will not help the planet more than conventional farming does. The good news is that if we do get a grip on our fossil fuel consumption, farming may not have to change much at all. In fact, based on the latest estimates from the EPA, agriculture as a whole makes up just 10% of greenhouse gas emissions, compared to the average 30% from vehicles and vehicles. 22% from business processes.