How much better than Hubble would be a deep Roman statue?

NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope, launched in 1990, revealed the unprecedented Universe.

Its large aperture, excellent instrumentation, and location in space enabled very long views.

Symbolically, Hubble’s deep field images demonstrate his best abilities.

By reappearing his “eye” on one region, he collects photons once and for all from the Universe.

Through multi-wave observation, Hubble discovered thousands of objects farthest from Earth.

Looking at larger divisions, Hubble Frontier Fields ’campaign was highly variable.

Grazing from distant galaxy giants increases and diverts light from back galaxies.

Even today, Hubble remains the best location-based optical observatory.

Many ask, “why don’t we just build another Hubble?”

For the same price, conventional technology enables advanced options.

NASA’s flagship after James Webb is the Nancy Grace Roman Telescope.

Formerly known as WFIRST, it is similar in size to Hubble, but with a broader view.

The Roman was able to create images with a depth similar to Hubble, but spanning more than 100 times Hubble’s viewpoint.

Instead of thousands of ultra-long galaxies, one deep field expedition seeks millions.

They contain the weakest, farthest, most active galaxies ever discovered.

Its Wide-Field Instrument, when launched, could be the greatest iconographer in history.


Mostly Mute Monday tells a celestial story in images, images, and no more than 200 words. Talk less; laugh more.

.Source