ONE System | 30/01/2021 13:31
Enrique Saborit falls (Radad Jabara)
Three days after this season’s game, the referees’ professional committee today (Saturday) published its conclusions from the major decisions in rounds 16 and 17 of the Premier League, with the Bloomfield meeting between the leaders of course in focus.
“In the 12th minute, the screen referee correctly diagnosed that no offense had been committed in the open and recommended that the referee examine the cancellation of a penalty kick that was stopped in favor of Tel Aviv. Fell in the open and Greenfeld first pointed to the white spot.
Regarding the game between Hapoel Tel Aviv and Hapoel Haifa from the 16th round, it was stated: “In the 19th minute, screen referee Idan Leiba correctly diagnosed a Haifa player’s foul on the court and recommended referee Roi Reinschreiber to examine a penalty kick. After examining the incident on the screen, the referee ruled In accordance with a penalty kick to the credit of Tel Aviv.
Regarding the game between Maccabi Petah Tikva and MS Ashdod, also in the 16th round, it was written that in the 36th minute, screen referee Greenfeld correctly diagnosed a different offense during the offensive that led to scoring a goal for Petah Tikva and reported to referee Yigal Fried to cancel it. The judge canceled the gate accordingly (no access to the screen is required as this is a factual event that does not require interpretation).
In the game between Maccabi Haifa and Bnei Sakhnin, the union reacted to Aviad Shiloach, stating: “In the extra time of the game, the screen referee had to refrain from recommending that the referee examine a red card for the Sakhnin player. This is not a prevention of a definite opportunity to score a goal in the course that led to the penalty kick to the credit of Haifa and certainly not in a case that justifies intervention. The judge acted correctly when he remained with his initial decision after examining the incident on the screen.
In addition to their conclusions, the union added that there have been a number of disciplinary incidents recently among officials from team benches and that judges have been instructed to persevere and enforce enforcement and punishment, in accordance with constitutional provisions.
