Launch yourself from high enough and it won’t take long to see what would win in a battle between gravity and the forces that bind hard ground.
Gravity’s relative weakness, at least in comparison to the strength of electromagnetism and the nuclear forces, seems to limit its power to onions on the large scales of planets and galaxies.
For this reason, coupled with the challenge of marrying a common affinity with quantum physics, physics tends to play a role in wave-wave gravity in the formation of grains by hiding it with a somewhat corrective feature irregular.
Two physicists from the Institute of Grazing and Cosmology at the University of Public Relations (RUDN University) are now rethinking the place of gravity among nature’s building blocks, finding solutions to equations that would give more space to this small force in explaining how basic grains may appear.
At first glance, it looks like an unnecessary study. For normal basic particles, such as an electron, its electromagnetic drag is 10 ^ 40 times stronger than it could be.
Introducing the effect of gravity when describing electron movements around the nucleus of an atom would be similar to taking into account the effect of a mosquito when talking about a car accident.
Researchers Ahmed Alharthy and Vladimir V. Kassandrov believe that the mosquito may be more important than we believe, at least on the mind-boggling level of Planck’s scale.
“Weight could be important in a microworld, and this assumption is confirmed by specific data,” says Kassandrov.
Solutions based on basic field theory equations in curved space time seem to leave room for a small but non-zero effect on gravity when we move close. As distances decline, gravity thatching will eventually compare to the costs of grafting.
There are also models that describe solitary waves forming in quantum fields in which the small impact of gravity may help to stabilize the wave.
Both went back to semi-classical models of electromagnetic field equations, changing out the commonly used hand-held correction and applying rules that allow them to turn certain sizes while in which they ensure that others are established.
By increasing in size explaining the cost and volume of the known basic grains, the team in search of solutions was put up.
For the most part, there were no clear situations where pressure was necessary, at least for known grains.
However, there were situations where moving distances were around 10 ^ -33 meters for charged materials with a mass of 10 ^ -5 grams where solutions appeared.
The theories are not sure whether their answers describe anything we might find in the Universe, although they do set some boundaries on a spectrum that corresponds to hypothetical semi-quantum grains called maximons.
Pushing the maths further, as the cost of electricity goes down to zero on the smallest blades, and beauty grows to stellar size, it is clear that gravity will be a key feature in the appearance of some objects from the quantum landscape.
That may sound like a flexible flight, but neutral neutral waves are the very objects that make up hypothetical objects called boson stars.
For now, gravity will continue to be reduced to a dynamic side note in particle physics, its small force of mathematical complexity offering no major advantage in solving it.
One day, we may just have to give the weakest of the four fundamental forces on the smallest scales of the Universe.
“In the future, we would like to shed light on this problem that is interesting to physicists but very complex from a mathematical point of view,” says Kassandrov.
This research was published in Universe.