A day after another compromise attempt failed between the parties, the arbitrator Adv. Amiel Tagar rejected Maor Buzaglo’s request to return to Hapoel Tel Aviv training, this evening (Monday) informed his representative Adv. Shai Elias and the Adumim’s legal counsel Adv. Moshe Ben Dat and The owners of the club are the brothers Sharon and Itzik Nisnov, Boaz Toshav and Zeev Greenberg.
“At this stage – and having already contracted with another player – the team is not professionally interested in the player, so my decision will mean his return to training only,” the arbitrator wrote in his decision. “This format was tried by the parties as part of the deliberative agreement between them, and unfortunately it did not work: the player claims to be denied team training and had to train alone on the court and the team claims that the player” made a mess in the locker room “. The parties, it seems, on the contrary.
Therefore, forcing the team to share the player in training will lead to more litigation before the question of who is “to blame” for not doing so, and not necessarily the player will actually return to sports activities. The player’s request was submitted after the end of the period. Was well known to the player, and when he saw that this period was coming to an end without finding another team or reaching an agreement with the team regarding the extension of the period, he had to hurry and make a suitable request, to prevent his disengagement from the team activity. This is how we are about a month after the player last trained in the team, when a considerable part of the passage of time must be attributed to the player’s failures.
“On July 20, 2013, the team informed the player that he was released and as a result he could move to any team. This was also stipulated in the hearing arrangement (between his goals to allow the player to return to training to make it easier for him to find another team). “A legitimate player (at least) in most Premier League teams. Therefore, the player’s claim that he could not find another team to absorb him into its ranks, without being forced to pay for the player’s transfer when there is no limit to the player’s salary.”
The player announced that he is ready to play in the ranks of the team without compensation (without detracting from his claims as per the team) as long as he returns to practice. In the absence of power, the player claims that it was not possible to find another team to absorb the player, since the defendant takes care to publish that the player is an injured player. I have a very hard time accepting this argument: after all, the player has already returned to practice following the hearing arrangement (this indicates his medical condition and if that is not enough, a team that wants a player for very attractive terms of employment, can examine his health and will avoid it just because of the defendant. He will whisper in her ear that this is a player who is still injured. “
“If so, I was not convinced that the alternative solution was exhausted. I therefore came to the conclusion that there is no room to accept the request,” concluded Advocate Tagar. “I hope my decision will not be the end of the story regarding the player’s participation in the team’s activities.” At least the team must remember that there is a significant risk that the player’s claim will be accepted in the relevant components, so that at the end of the day you will be required to pay the player (also) for the remaining three months until the end of the season. “The team will lose several times: it will also bear the payments it undertook to pay the player for this period and will not enjoy the possibility that it will contribute to its ability.
More Shai Elias and Roi Almadai, A representative of Buzaglo said: “We are pleased with the decision of the arbitrator who sends a message to Hapoel Tel Aviv that the chances of Maor Buzaglo’s lawsuit being accepted are very high. The arbitrator also noted that Hapoel Tel Aviv’s position is incomprehensible, there is a good chance that Hapoel Tel Aviv will pay Maor wages, in any case, until the end of the season and her opposition to his return to the team, without justification, will expose her to double compensation, especially since Maor agreed to return for free. Hapoel Tel Aviv will pay a lot of money for professional damage caused to Maor Bouzaglo, due to ego and unwise decisions. “
