Ant turns from fall to nightmare for the global investors

Jack Ma

Photographer: Scott Eells

Two months ago, global investors were on the verge of a windfall from what would have been the world’s first major public offering. Now, a return on the hundreds of millions of dollars invested The Ant Group Co. in danger.

China has ordered Ant to rethink its fintech businesses – spanning from wealth management to consumer credit lending and insurance – and return to the roots as a payment service.

While the central bank’s statement on Sunday was brief in detail, it threatens the growth and most profitable operation of billionaire Jack Ma’s online financial empire. The management stopped calling for no direct bankruptcy on the company, but stressed the importance of Ant “understanding the need to modernize the business” and they asked him to create a plan and timetable as soon as possible.

Keynote speakers at Viva Technology Conference

Photographer: Marlene Awaad / Bloomberg

Authorities also supported Ant for sub-par corporate governance, disregard for regulatory requirements, and engaging in regulatory negotiations. The central bank said Ant used its leadership to ban competitors, hurting the interests of hundreds of millions of users.

Ant said in response that he had set up a special team to comply with regulators’ requests. It will maintain business operations for consumers, voting not to raise prices for consumers and financial partners, while putting in place risk controls.

The company, which is based in Hangzhou, needs to set up a separate financial property company to comply with regulations and ensure it has sufficient capital, regulators said.

Anatomy of a Chinese financial powerhouse

The giant Jack Ma has moved towards technology and services

Sources: Ant Group, Goldman Sachs, data compiled by Bloomberg


Here are some scenarios from investors and analysts on what the restructuring would look like:

Calmly

Optimists say regulators are simply reaffirming their right to oversee the country ‘s financial sector, warning internet companies not to expect major change.

Beijing could be trying to set an example out of Ma’s Ant, the largest among several new but diffuse fintech platforms. Such breakdowns in the past have dealt with short-term shocks to companies, usually leaving them without a loss. Social media giant Tencent Holdings Ltd., for example, became an explicit target in a campaign to combat child game slavery in 2018. Although its shares hit, they eventually overcame levels. high full-time.

Ant Affinity, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., likewise, gained investor reassurance after a short-term sale following allegations from authorities on everything from unfairly pushing buyers to turning a blind eye to fares on their e-commerce platform.

“I do not think regulators are considering breaking up Ant, as fintech in China does not have monopoly status,” said Zhang Kai, an analyst at market research firm Analysys Ltd. act focuses on Ant but also sends a warning to other Chinese fintech companies. “

Some see it as an opportunity for Ant. With the industry as a whole overseeing tighter controls, Ant has more resources to deal with the challenges as a business leader, Zhang said.

Bad

A more likely outcome would be a move by regulators to break up Ant Group. That would damage the shareholder structure, and damage the fastest growing businesses.

Valued at around $ 315 billion before the first public offering was canceled, Ant corral attracted investments from the world’s largest funds. These include: Warburg Pincus LLC, Carlyle Group Inc., Silver Lake Management LLC, Temasek Holdings Pte and GIC Pte.

The company was backed by global investors when it was valued at around $ 150 billion in the last round of fundraising in 2018. A. break up the return on their investments would be uncertain, with the timeline for an upcoming IPO in November now pushed to the future.

The government could ask Ant to take away their more lucrative jobs in wealth management, credit lending and insurance, downloading them to a financial property company that needs a more rigorous investigation.

“The emerging reality is that Chinese regulators are adopting similar regulation to banks and fintech players,” said Michael Norris, manager of research and strategy at AgencyChina, a Shanghai-based advisory group.

.Source