Winner League Basket 20-21
Game board
Cycle 16 – 14/02/2021
- Hapoel Jerusalem
- 66 – 94
- Hapoel B’Sh
- Urban Ness Ziona
- 89 – 84
- Hapoel Eilat
- Gilboa / Galil
- 79 – 92
- Urban Nahariya
- Maccabi Tel Aviv
- 81 – 100
- Hapoel Holon
- Bnei Herzliya
- 79 – 91
- Hapoel Haifa
- Maccabi Rishon LeZion
- Thursday, 11/03, 7 p.m.
- Hapoel Tel Aviv
Gidi Lipkin 16/02/2021 15:06
Yedidya Rapaport (Noam Moreno)
Yedidya Rapaport, a former representative of the owner of Hapoel Tel Aviv, has opened two enforcement cases against Rami Cohen, chairman of Hapoel Tel Aviv in basketball, and against his cosmopolitan company. The demand is for a financial loan that Rapaport gave to Cohen in 2015 and today (Tuesday) during a legal hearing between Rapaport and Hapoel Tel Aviv during one of the breaks, he surprised Cohen with the spending portfolios of NIS 130,000.
One check given to Rapaport was by Cohen personally for a sum of NIS 50,000 and a second check was for a sum of NIS 80,000 and was given by a cosmopolitan company owned by Cohen.
The chairman of Hapoel Tel Aviv said in response that: “During the discussion today, he threw me a bag, it is something old business that was between us that is not related to the group. I hurried from the court to deal with my case and have not yet read what is there.
Rappaport is represented by attorneys Roi Saloki and Shirley Rubinstein of the firm Saloki Kosover & Co.
During the legal hearing between Rapaport, who is demanding NIS 5.1 million from Hapoel Tel Aviv, and the group itself, the court headed by Judge Yonah Etadegi ruled that Hapoel Tel Aviv would continue to pay the bank loans “back to back” as the usher Rappaport took for the team during The years in accordance with the repayment schedules of the lending bank. The court also warned that if Hapoel Tel Aviv stopped, Rappaport would be able to appeal again and impose foreclosures.
Hapoel Tel Aviv claims that it continues to pay the loans and it is only another loan of about NIS 10,000 per month until the legal matter between the parties is decided.
At the same time, the parties will turn to the court for mediation and try to reach agreements on the other financial disputes that her friends are claiming. The latter claims that he deserves back the money he gave to the group over the years, while the group claims that he gave the group monetary donations and does not deserve to get back.
Pay attention to the conduct of the basketball team, one of the largest in Israeli basketball. Rapaport said during his testimony in court that: “Things went the way I gave the association a loan when I saw that the association needed a loan and I took money back when I saw that the association could afford it.”
During the interrogation, Rapaport was asked about his contribution of NIS 300,000 in the 2018/19 season, which was submitted to the control, and he was asked: “How come you do not jump and shout and answer what you are talking about. It is not a donation, but a loan. “Not only because you want that money back, but it is also a wrong figure that is being submitted for control.”
To this he replied that: “I see that email, I see that I am writing to him and I do not remember him. We could not submit data to the budgetary control that these are loans but donations. What’s more, a standing order was immediately established that returned to me the money and this loan that I took out for Hapoel Tel Aviv, and this loan began to be paid. “
In fact, Rapaport hints that Hapoel Tel Aviv allegedly reported to the control a contribution on what was in fact a financial loan.
