A Rochester Institute of Technology researcher has tested a device that measures adherence to a child’s feeding routine used by pediatricians, nutritionists, social workers, and child psychologists to assess and prevent parental nutritional habits. put on nutritional problems.
The best approach, called the Satter Load in Feeding Division, is now rigorously tested and peer-reviewed, resulting in the sDOR measurable device. 2-6y. The questionnaire is going to be a routine parental survey for professionals and researchers working in the field of early childhood development, predicts lead researcher Barbara Lohse, director of the RIT School of Health and Nutrition at Wegmans.
We have shown that Satter analysis can be used to measure that a 2 to 6 year old is at nutritional risk. It is important to identify that early and prevent it from following because the last thing we want is for a baby to be at nutritional risk. They are not going to grow or develop properly. “
Barbara Lohse, Director, RIT Wegmans School of Health and Nutrition
Pediatricians and other professionals working with young children need proper tools to assess risk factors associated with a child’s physical and emotional eating environment. The correct questionnaire completed by a parent or guardian of a child about feeding and feeding babies can lead to timely interventions.
While there have been many studies on infant feeding, to date, none have adequately measured Satter’s role in nutrition, Lohse noted. “The theory-based, research-backed approach is used in medical institutions, public health, and in early childhood health education institutions.”
Developed by Ellyn Satter, the approach is related to good parenting and good eating behavior and family dynamics. The Ellyn Satter Institute offers models for improving feeding dynamics and eating ability and is a resource for healthcare professionals, educators and the general public.
Satter’s sensible approach to infant feeding and eating did not lack the supporting evidence to explain why and how it worked. Lohse and Satter aimed to test and prove a strict separation of duty separation in feeding. They ran the survey down from 38 to 12 questions based on interviews with parents, video-recorded parent-child interactions around feeding time, and compared it with other validation studies to the Satter Division Responsibility tool in Create a feed, the sDOR.2-6y.
“The key thing that really matters is that this 12-subject study was able to identify children who are at nutritional risk,” Lohse said. “Satter’s study had a clear link with other proven instruments on parental feeding that is much longer and much more in-depth.”
The survey also provides insights into areas of parental activity such as sleep, stress, and parenting style, Lohse said. Her research shows that parents who follow Satter’s Responsibility Division tend to be more able to eat and display other related items. “They tend to get better sleep and less control, emotional eating,” Lohse said. “It was important to find out that the parents who use the approach have better habits. here they are. “
The authors’ conclusions are reflected in the Journal of Nutrition and Behavior Education and the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Source:
Rochester Institute of Technology