Iran responds to chief of staff: “We will not hesitate to defend ourselves against an Israeli attack”

by

Mahmoud Wazi, the head of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani’s office, today (Wednesday) addressed a speech delivered last night by Chief of Staff Aviv Kochavi, in which he announced that he had instructed the army to prepare a new operational plan to thwart Iran’s nuclear program, saying: “Iran will not hesitate to defend On herself in the event of an Israeli attack. ” He added that “Israel has no plan and no power to attack Iran. It’s all a psychological war.”

And then he also addressed the issue of the nuclear deal, about which Kochavi said that a return to the 2015 nuclear deal, or a similar agreement, was a wrong move – contrary to the new US administration’s position, explaining: “Biden’s director is independent, And Washington’s decisions are no longer made in Israel. “

Chief of Staff Kochavi in ​​speech against Iran, credit IDF Spokesman

As mentioned, Chief of Staff Lt. Col. Aviv Kochavi spoke last night at the opening of the annual international conference of the Institute for National Security Studies INSS and addressed, among other things, the Iranian issue. “Iran is a regional and global problem. Above all there is no doubt that Iran aspires to be a military nuclear state and make use of it,” he said. “I have instructed the IDF to prepare a number of operational plans in addition to existing ones, and we are working on these plans, and we will open them up in the coming year. “Whoever decides to run them is, of course, the political echelon, but the plans must be on the table, practiced and ready for action.”

Kochavi went on to say: “Returning to the 2015 nuclear deal or a similar agreement with a number of improvements is a bad thing and not true. If the 2015 nuclear deal had materialized, Iran could eventually move on to get itself a bomb, as the deal did not include restrictions “In the end, anything resembling a current agreement or an improved agreement is a bad thing – it should not be allowed.”

“I want to clarify my position – back to the nuclear agreement from 2015 and even if an improved agreement is reached it will be a bad agreement at the operational and strategic level, and therefore such an agreement must not be allowed.” The chief of staff explained that a return to such an agreement “would eventually or before its end be possible to enrich quantities and develop centrifuges and weapons capabilities to the point of assaulting a bomb.

.Source